It would seem that the modern
age is capable of assimilating the concept of a “stay at home” father, however
I continue to face two questions time and time again. The first is an inquiry as to what I do for a
living. Rather than place them into the
wonderland that is our family’s concept of gender roles, I simply respond that
I am retired. Strange though it may
seem, for most people, the concept of a man being retired at 37 seems less
confusing than a man of the same age making the decision to abandon a legal
career and stay at home to raise two children in favor of a change in his
wife’s career. The statement regarding
retirement isn’t met with the same awkward silence as the alternative and I
have found that it often garners a moment of envy from those I speak with. The question that follows is the same
regardless of my stance as a stay at home father or a retiree, and in turn my
response is the same. They inevitably
ask how I fill my days. They ask this
very forward question and it invariably causes me to marvel at each person’s
concept of time.
I typically reserve my
editorial comments and simply respond with the laundry list of activities that
any stay at home parent is well familiar with.
Between these duties, I do my best to endeavor into the arts whenever
possible and that passion is causing me to need an agenda book to organize the
sheer number of activities that I now try to jam into a “working” day . . .
language lessons, guitar lessons, writing when I can, painting when I can and
contemplating the meaning of life when I shouldn’t. This description meets with the same mixed
response I receive when I fluctuate between retiree and stay at home dad. Those that believe me to be retired are
interested and greet the answer with a kind smile. Those that believe I have abandoned a career
turn a cold shoulder and treat my current calling with less respect than my
prior endeavors in the legal profession.
Those that hear I am a stay at home father inevitably ask if I miss
working (there is a notable lack of perspective there if one believes that
staying at home is not “working”). Those
that hear I am retired never ask such a stupid question as the answer of “no”
is implied by the act of retirement itself.
Sure, if I gave it any
thought (which I don’t), I would suppose there are things to be missed about my
lost profession. That being said, I am
reflective enough to know that there isn’t a force on heaven or earth that
could cause me to regret the latter for a loss of the former. Time is a gift, and regardless of my current
concept thereof, I choose not to waste it with contemplation of the road I did
not travel. Perhaps I will pass this way
again someday and see where that other road leads, but for now, it is not the
path that I must follow. Although I have
so much to say that it boggles my mind, I must cut this entry short in favor of
other endeavors. I have a new found joy
in the words of others and have released my death grip on the concept that the
only words worth dissecting are my own.
That being said I have a book to finish, laundry to fold, toilets that
need cleaning and calloused fingers that need to remain calloused for Stevie
Ray Vaughn’s sake. We will speak again
soon. R.
1 comments:
I have traveled the road you did not travel and can assure you that you are on the right road. I am only now trying to travel the road you are traveling and wish I had fully used my creative energies much earlier in my life. Unfortunately, Americans are cursed with many misconceptions, not the least of which is what constitutes "work." I think it is productivity. Most Americans think it is only that which produce a paycheck. By their misbegotten definition, many of the greatest parents, artists, writers, musicians and philosophers did not "work." Stay on the path Jack. You are right. They are wrong.
Post a Comment